Controversies and Conundrums in Cardiac Cachexia: Key Questions About Wasting in Patients With HFrEF.

Cardiac cachexia is characterized by unintentional catabolic weight loss, decreased appetite, and inflammation and is common in patients with stage D (advanced) heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Cardiac cachexia and related muscle-wasting syndromes are markers of, and a consequence of, the heart failure (HF) syndrome. Although many potential modalities for identifying cardiac cachexia exist, the optimal definition, diagnostic tools, and treatment options for cardiac cachexia remain unclear. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether attempts to reverse muscle wasting prior to advanced HF surgeries, such as left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation, can improve outcomes. It is important that HF clinicians and dietitians are aware of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of muscle-wasting syndromes in patients with HF, to aid in the recognition and risk stratification of advanced HFrEF. Although the opportunities and rationale for attempting to address cardiac cachexia prior to advanced HF surgeries are uncertain, recent publications suggest that control of the neurohumoral syndrome of advanced HF may be important to permit the recovery of skeletal muscle mass.

Sex-specific patterns of donor-derived cell-free DNA in heart transplant rejection: An analysis from the Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation (GRAfT).

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive methods for surveillance of acute rejection are increasingly used in heart transplantation (HT), including donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). As other cardiac biomarkers differ by sex, we hypothesized that there may be sex-specific differences in the performance of dd-cfDNA for the detection of acute rejection. The purpose of the current study was to examine patterns of dd-cfDNA seen in quiescence and acute rejection in male and female transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation who were ≥18 years at the time of HT were included. Rejection was defined by endomyocardial biopsy with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥2R and/or antibody-mediated rejection ≥ pAMR 1. dd-cfDNA was quantitated using shotgun sequencing. Median dd-cfDNA levels were compared between sexes during quiescence and rejection. The performance of dd-cfDNA by sex was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. Allograft injury was defined as dd-cfDNA ≥0.25%. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one unique patients (49 female, 32%) were included in the analysis with 1,119 available dd-cfDNA measurements. Baseline characteristics including demographics and comorbidities were not significantly different between sexes. During quiescence, there were no significant sex differences in median dd-cfDNA level (0.04% [IQR 0.00, 0.16] in females vs 0.03% [IQR 0.00, 0.12] in males, p = 0.22). There were no significant sex differences in median dd-cfDNA for ACR (0.33% [0.21, 0.36] in females vs 0.32% [0.21, 1.10] in males, p = 0.57). Overall, median dd-cfDNA levels were higher in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) than ACR but did not significantly differ by sex (0.50% [IQR 0.18, 0.82] in females vs 0.63% [IQR 0.32, 1.95] in males, p = 0.51). Elevated dd-cfDNA detected ACR/AMR with an AUROC of 0.83 in females and 0.89 in males, p-value for comparison = 0.16. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant sex differences in dd-cfDNA levels during quiescence and rejection. Performance characteristics were similar, suggesting similar diagnostic thresholds can be used in men and women for rejection surveillance.

The Cardiac Amyloidosis Registry Study (CARS): Rationale, Design and Methodology.

BACKGROUND: CARS (Cardiac Amyloidosis Registry Study) is a multicenter registry established in 2019 that includes patients with transthyretin (ATTR, wild-type and variant) and light chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis (CA) evaluated at major amyloidosis centers between 1997 and 2025. CARS aims to describe the natural history of CA with attention to clinical and diagnostic variables at the time of diagnosis, real-world treatment patterns, and associated outcomes of patients in a diverse cohort that is more representative of the at-risk population than that described in CA clinical trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: This article describes the design and methodology of CARS, including procedures for data collection and preliminary results. As of February 2023, 20 centers in the United States enrolled 1415 patients, including 1155 (82%) with ATTR and 260 (18%) with AL CA. Among those with ATTR, wild-type is the most common ATTR (71%), and most of the 305 patients with variant ATTR have the p.V142I mutation (68%). A quarter of the total population identifies as Black. More individuals with AL are female (39%) compared to those with ATTR (13%). CONCLUSIONS: CARS will answer crucial clinical questions about CA natural history and permit comparison of different therapeutics not possible through current clinical trials. Future international collaboration will further strengthen the validity of observations of this increasingly recognized condition.

Cardiac Cachexia in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients and the Implications of Weight Gain Early After Implantation.

Background Severe cardiac cachexia or malnutrition are commonly considered relative contraindications to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but post-LVAD prognosis for patients with cachexia is uncertain. Methods and Results Intermacs (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) 2006 to 2017 was queried for the preimplantation variable cachexia/malnutrition. Cox proportional hazards modeling examined the relationship between cachexia and LVAD outcomes. Of 20 332 primary LVAD recipients with available data, 516 (2.54%) were reported to have baseline cachexia and had higher risk baseline characteristics. Cachexia was associated with higher mortality during LVAD support (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.56]; P<0.0001), persisting after adjustment for baseline characteristics (adjusted HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.0-1.42]; P=0.005). Mean weight change at 12 months was +3.9±9.4 kg. Across the cohort, weight gain ≥5% during the first 3 months of LVAD support was associated with lower mortality (unadjusted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98]; P=0.012; adjusted HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.97]; P=0.006). Conclusions The proportion of LVAD recipients recognized to have cachexia preimplantation was low at 2.5%. Recognized cachexia was independently associated with higher mortality during LVAD support. Early weight gain ≥5% was independently associated with lower mortality during subsequent LVAD support.

Long-Term Changes in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Longitudinal Joint Model Analysis.

Background Advanced kidney disease is often a relative contraindication to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation because of concerns for poor outcomes including worsening kidney disease. Data are lacking on long-term changes and sex-based differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with published data limited by potential bias introduced by the competing risks of death and heart transplantation. Methods and Results We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 288 adults receiving durable continuous-flow LVADs from January 2010 to December 2017 at a single center. A joint model was constructed to evaluate change in eGFR over 2 years, the prespecified primary outcome, adjusted for the competing risks of death and heart transplantation. Median baseline eGFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (interquartile range 42-78). At 2 years, 74 patients died and 104 received a heart transplant. In unadjusted analysis, LVAD recipients had a modest initial increase in eGFR of ≈2 mL/min per 1.73 m2 within the first 6 months after implantation, followed by a decrease in eGFR below baseline values at 1 and 2 years. Men experienced an eGFR decline of 5 to 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2 over the first year which then stabilized, while women had an ≈5 mL/min per 1.73 m2 increase in eGFR within the first 6 months followed by decline towards baseline eGFR levels (interaction P=0.005). Conclusions Estimated GFR remains relatively stable in most patients following LVAD implantation. Larger studies are needed to investigate sex-based differences in eGFR and to evaluate eGFR trajectory and mortality in LVAD recipients with lower eGFR.

The effect of tablet computer-based telemonitoring added to an established telephone disease management program on heart failure hospitalizations: The Specialized Primary and Networked Care in Heart Failure (SPAN-CHF) III Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications are becoming increasingly common. Prior work has demonstrated reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations with HF disease management programs; however, few of these programs have used tablet computer-based technology. METHODS: Participants with a diagnosis of HF and at least 1 high risk feature for hospitalization were randomized to either an established telephone-based disease management program or the same disease management program with the addition of remote monitoring of weight, blood pressure, heart rate and symptoms via a tablet computer for 90 days. The primary endpoint was the number of days hospitalized for HF assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: From August 2014 to April 2019, 212 participants from 3 hospitals in Massachusetts were randomized 3:1 to telemonitoring-based HF disease management (n = 159) or telephone-based HF disease management (n = 53) with 98% of individuals in both study groups completing the 90 days of follow-up. There was no significant difference in the number of days hospitalized for HF between the telemonitoring disease management group (0.88 ± 3.28 days per patient-90 days) and the telephone-based disease management group (1.00 ± 2.97 days per patient-90 days); incidence rate ratio 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.58; P = .442). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tablet-based telemonitoring to an established HF telephone-based disease management program did not reduce HF hospitalizations; however, study power was limited.

The End of Endomyocardial Biopsy?: A Practical Guide for Noninvasive Heart Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

Noninvasive heart transplant rejection surveillance using gene expression profiling (GEP) to monitor immune activation is widely used among heart transplant programs. With the new development of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) assays, more programs are transitioning to a predominantly noninvasive rejection surveillance protocol with a reduced frequency of endomyocardial biopsies. As a result, many practical questions arise that potentially delay implementation of these valuable new tools. The purpose of this review is to provide practical guidance for clinicians transitioning toward a less invasive acute rejection monitoring protocol after heart transplantation, and to answer 10 common questions about the GEP and dd-cfDNA assays. Evidence supporting GEP and dd-cfDNA testing is reviewed, as well as guidance on test interpretation and future directions.

Taking Care of Us© (TCU) study protocol: feasibility and acceptability of a dyadic intervention for couples living with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: There are more than 1 million hospital admissions and 3 million emergency visits for heart failure in the USA annually. Although spouse/partners make substantial contributions to the management of heart failure and experience poor health and high levels of care strain, they are rarely the focus of heart failure interventions. This protocol describes a pilot randomized controlled trial that tests the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary change in outcomes of a seven-session couple-based intervention called Taking Care of Us© (TCU). The TCU© intervention is grounded in the theory of dyadic illness management and was developed to promote collaborative illness management and better physical and mental health of adults with heart failure and their partners. METHODS: A two-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Eligible adults with heart failure and their co-residing spouse/partner will be recruited from a clinical site in the USA and community/social media outreach and randomized to either the TCU© intervention or to a control condition (SUPPORT©) that offers education around heart failure management. The target sample is 60 couples (30 per arm). TCU© couples will receive seven sessions over 2 months via Zoom; SUPPORT© couples will receive three sessions over 2 months via Zoom. All participants will complete self-report measures at baseline (T1), post-treatment (T2), and 3 months post-treatment (T3). Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention will be examined using both closed-ended and open-ended questions as well as enrollment, retention, completion, and satisfaction metrics. Preliminary exploration of change in outcomes of TCU© on dyadic health, dyadic appraisal, and collaborative management will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: Theoretically driven, evidence-based dyadic interventions are needed to optimize the health of both members of the couple living with heart failure. Results from this study will provide important information about recruitment and retention and benefits and drawbacks of the TCU© program to directly inform any needed refinements of the program and decision to move to a main trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737759) registered on 27 January 2021.

Impella 5.5 Support Beyond 50 Days as Bridge to Heart Transplant in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients.

Prolonged mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for severe left ventricular dysfunction in cardiogenic shock as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) generally requires a surgical procedure. Typically, a surgically implanted temporary extracorporeal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is chosen because of superior flow and durability compared with a percutaneously delivered endovascular LVAD (pVAD). However, compared with its predecessors, the Impella 5.5 trans-valvular pVAD provides higher hemodynamic support and features improved durability. Here, we present four successful cases with prolonged Impella 5.5 support as a bridge to HTx, with a mean support duration of 70 days (maximum 83 days). These cases highlight several potential benefits of Impella 5.5. The minimally invasive implantation procedure of the device reduces bleeding, decreases the postoperative recovery period, and enables early patient ambulation to reduce physical deconditioning before HTx surgery. Furthermore, Impella 5.5 adequately unloads the left ventricle and provides hemodynamic support to maintain end-organ function to further optimize hemodynamics before HTx. The evolution of Impella 5.5 technology may provide an alternative bridging strategy to traditional surgically implanted temporary MCS in select cases.

Association between postoperative hemodynamic metrics of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: While preoperative hemodynamic risk factors associated with early right heart failure (RHF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery are well-established, the relationship between postoperative hemodynamic status and subsequent outcomes remains poorly defined. METHODS: We analyzed adult CF-LVAD patients from the STS-INTERMACS registry surviving at least 3 months without evidence of early RHF and with hemodynamic data available at 3 months after LVAD implant. The association between metrics of RV afterload and function and the subsequent risk of death, right heart failure (RHF), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), or stroke were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Among 1,050 patients with available 3-month hemodynamics, pulmonary hypertension was common, with 585 (55.7%) having mPAP ≥ 20 mm Hg and 164 (15.6%) having PVR ≥ 3 WU. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi, HR 0.62 per log-increase for values < 3, 95% CI 0.43-0.89) and PVR (HR 1.19 per 1 WU-increase for values > 1.5 WU, 95% CI 1.03-1.38) were independently associated with the composite of death or RHF. Postoperative RAP (HR 1.18 per 5 mm Hg increase, 95% CI 1.04-1.33), RAP:PCWP (HR 1.46 per log-increase, 95% CI 1.12-1.91), and PAPi (HR 0.76 per log-increase, 95% CI 0.61-0.95) were each associated with GIB risk. Postoperative hemodynamics was not associated with stroke risk. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic metrics of postoperative RV dysfunction and elevated RV afterload are independently associated with RHF, mortality and GIB. Whether strategies targeting postoperative optimization of RV function and afterload can reduce the burden of these adverse events requires prospective study.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. STRUCTURE: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. STRUCTURE: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary.

BACKGROUND: The 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (AHA/ACC/HFSA) Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure replaces the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure and the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews and other evidence conducted in human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies published through September 2021 were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments that have high-quality published economic analyses.